Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 9;72(Pt 9):687–691. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X16011778

Table 3. Analysis of the A20/D4 interface.

  Reference value Difference from the reference value
Construct WT D4/A201–50 D4/A201–50-W43A D4-R167A/A201–50 D4-P173G/A201–50
R.m.s.d. of Cα positions compared with WT (Å)   0.29 ± 0.03 0.32 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.01
Buried surface (from PISA)2) 1837 ± 21 −196 ± 9 −106 ± 7 −24 ± 11
Hydrogen bonds 10 −1 −1 0
Solvation free-energy gain (from PISA) (kcal mol−1) −13.0 ± 0.5 2.22 ± 0.16 −1.00 ± 0.10 0.50 ± 0.06
Energy of the cation–π interaction of Trp43 (from CAPTURE)§ (kcal mol−1) −4.2 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.3
Total of interaction energies (kcal mol−1) −17.2 ± 0.6 6.4 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.4
Melting-temperature change (from Contesto-Richefeu et al., 2014) (°C) 47.3 −5.3 −3.6 −4.6
Complex formation upon co-expression (from Contesto-Richefeu et al., 2014) +++ +/− +++ ++/−

Only residues involved in the contact around Trp43 were used in order to calculate the change. Average value for the two copies in the asymmetric unit.

Loss of the hydrogen bond between the carbonyl of Thr41 and Arg167 Nη1 shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(d).

§

Average value for the two copies in the asymmetric unit.

Sum of the solvation free-energy gain and the energy of the cation–π interaction.