Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;4:188. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00188

Table 2.

Logistic regression model of mammography non-adherence.

Variable Level Odds ratio 95% confidence interval p-Value
Socioeconomic factors
Race NH White vs. NH Black 2.16b 0.26b, 0.82b 0.009b
NH White vs. Hispanic 4.17b 0.12b, 0.48b 0.001b
Marital status Married 1.00 0.57, 1.77 0.99
Not married
Education level >High school 0.90 0.50, 1.61 0.72
≤High school
Employment status Employed 0.75 0.42, 1.34 0.33
Not employed
Income level >$50,000 1.27 0.64, 2.50 0.49
≤$50,000
Age in years a 0.65b 0.48, 0.88b 0.01b
Health-care access factors
Health insurance No 3.22b 1.54b, 6.73b 0.002b
Yes
Usual source of medical care No 3.37b 1.43b, 7.94b 0.01b
Yes
Psychological factors
Self-efficacy for screening Not confident 2.43b 1.26b, 4.73 0.01b
Confident
Perceived risk for breast cancer Not at risk 1.70 0.58, 4.99 0.33
At risk
Cultural factors
Temporal orientation Agree 0.70 0.39, 1.27 0.24
Disagree
Interpersonal relationships a 0.98 0.72, 1.32 0.88
Religiosity a 1.42b 1.00b, 2.00b 0.05b
Autonomy a 0.88 0.68, 1.13 0.31

p-Value means probability value, and NH means non-Hispanic.

Italic font indicates statistically significant findings.

aNo level(s) reported.

bThere was a significant association with non-adherence in the regression model.