Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 2;39(5):855–865. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9762-6

Table 3.

Results per step of the mediation analyses

Construct latent variables R2 Adding confounders R2 Adding mediators R2
β (95 %CI) β (95 %CI) β (95 %CI)
1. Constructed latent variables
Appraisala GSES 0.59
(0.47; 0.71)
0.61
(0.48; 0.73)
0.64
(0.55; 0.74)
ICQ-helplessness 0.65
(0.53; 0.77)
0.55
(0.43; 0.68)
0.58
(0.48; 0.68)
ICQ-acceptation 0.67
(0.55; 0.79)
0.74
(0.62; 0.87)
0.62
(0.53; 0.72)
Participationa Autonomy indoors 0.68
(0.60; 0.77)
0.70
(0.62; 0.78)
0.70
(0.62; 0.77)
Family role 0.70
(0.62; 0.78)
0.70
(0.62; 0.78)
0.70
(0.63; 0.78)
Autonomy outdoors 0.82
(0.76; 0.89)
0.79
(0.73; 0.86)
0.80
(0.74; 0.87)
Social life and relationships 0.65
(0.56; 0.73)
0.61
(0.52; 0.70)
0.62
(0.54; 0.71)
Work and education 0.50
(0.39; 0.60)
0.47
(0.36; 0.39)
0.49
(0.38; 0.59)
2. Relation appraisal and participation 0.52
(0.38; 0.67)
0.27
3. Adjustment for confoundersb
Confounding on the relation of appraisal and participation CIS20r-fatigue −0.18
(−0.31; −0.06)
−0.12
(−0.25; 0.01)
CIS20r-concentration −0.17
(−0.30; −0.05)
−0.15
(−0.27; −0.02)
EDSS −0.06
(−0.22; 0.09)
−0.04
(−0.19; 0.10)
SF36-physical functioning 0.37
(0.21; 0.53)
0.32
(0.16; 0.48)
SF36-mental health 0.10
(−0.04; 0.23)
−0.01
(−0.20; 0.18)
4. Adjusted relation appraisal and participation 0.21
(0.04; 0.39)
0.37
5. Multiple mediation
5a. Appraisal-coping Task-oriented 0.39
(0.40; 0.85)
Emotion-oriented −0.63
(−1.74; −0.93)
Avoidance-oriented −0.11
(−0.52; −0.08)
5b. Coping- participation Task-oriented −0.13
(−0.03; 0.002)
Emotion-oriented −0.63
(−0.002; 0.04)
Avoidance-oriented −0.11
(−0.01; 0.01)
5a * 5b Indirect relations Appraisal-task-oriented coping-participation −0.08
(−0.17; 0.01)
Appraisal-emotion-oriented coping-participation −0.03
(−0.40; 0.33)
Appraisal-avoidance-oriented coping-participation −0.01
(−0.99; 0.98)
6. Final result multiple mediation model
Total indirect −0.12
(−0.20; 0.03)
Direct relation appraisal and participation 0.35
(0.12; 0.57)
0.40

CI confidence interval

aResults are standardized factor loadings

bThe relations of the five confounders with the three coping styles (i.e. 15 relations) are not displayed for clarity