Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 29;408(24):6679–6691. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9783-6

Table 2.

Size determination of nine TiO2 materials, from which two are reference materials, NM103 and NM104, and seven are pigments provided by commercial suppliers

TiO2 material Rt in aF4 (min) aF4-UV (Øh) (nm) aF4-MALS (Øg) (nm) Øg/Øh ratio spICPMS (nm) SEM aggregate size bin (modal) (nm) Primary particle (nm)
NM103 9.8 209 190 0.91 122 100–160 (155) 13–35
NM104 10.6 224 240 1.07 120 100–160 (135) 13–35
Pigment-1 15.7 333 420 1.26 128 160–250 (200) 60–300
Pigment-2 16.2 343 370 1.08 159 250–400 (320) 60–300
Pigment-3 16.7 354 370 1.05 221 250–400 (320) 60–300
Pigment-4 17.0 360 310 0.86 156 250–400 (320) 60–300
Pigment-5 17.4 368 400 1.09 220 250–400 (345) 60–300
Pigment-6 19.5 414 390 0.94 156 250–400 (375) 60–300
Pigment-7 22.7 480 440 0.92 158 400–650 (415) 60–300

Size determinations by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (aF4) separation and UV254 nm detection were performed on the basis of retention time after calibration with polystyrene standards. spICPMS single particle ICPMS, SEM scanning electron microscopy, Øg gyral diameter in nm from aF4-MALS detection using the Berry model for data processing, Øh hydrodynamic diameter in nm. SEM results are given as size bins in which modal diameters are observed and as size range (smallest-largest) in diameters of the constituting primary particles. Between brackets the modal diameters, estimated from a fit of SEM data points