Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;11(9):1640–1649. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11741115

Table 2.

Performance of GFR estimating equations

GFR Equations Absolute Bias (95% CI), ml/min per 1.73 m2 Percentage Bias (95% CI) Accuracy 10%, (N) Accuracy 30% (N) Precision, ml/min per 1.73 m2
eGFR MDRD −1.9 (−2.6 to −1.2) −2.2% (−4.0 to −0.3) 30.8%a (351) 80.4% (916) 14.6
eGFR Cr 0.8 (0.03 to 1.5) 3.1% (1.3 to 5.0) 35.2% (401) 80.4% (916) 13.7
eGFR CysC −8.7 (−9.2 to −8.1) −13.7% (−15.1 to −12.4) 27.8%a (317) 77.1%a (878) 11.7
eGFR Cr-CysC −5.0 (−5.6 to −4.5) −8.1% (−9.4 to −6.8) 33.2% (378) 86.5%a (985) 10.7

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; Cr, creatinine; CysC, cystatin C; Cr-CysC, creatinine-cystatin C.

a

P<0.05 compared with eGFR Cr with the McNemar test.