Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;34(25):3039–3046. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6826

Table 1.

Patient and Tumor Characteristics Among 62 Patients With MMR-Deficient Rectal Cancer

Characteristic No. of Patients (%)
Age at rectal cancer diagnosis, median (IQR), years 41 (35-54)
Sex
 Male 32 (52)
 Female 30 (48)
Race/ethnicity
 White 51 (82)
 Black 3 (5)
 Hispanic 4 (6.5)
 Asian 4 (6.5)
Rectal cancer presentation
 Rectal cancer as index cancer 58 (93.5)
 Synchronous high-risk colon lesion 12 (19.4)
 Prior colon cancer 4 (6.4)
Tumor distance from anal verge, median (IQR), cm 7.5 (4.6-12)
Tumor histologic grade
 Well differentiated 2 (3.2)
 Moderately differentiated 53 (85.5)
 Poorly differentiated 7 (11.3)
Mucinous tumor 38 (61.3)
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes 3 (4.8)
Clinical stage of rectal cancer at diagnosis
 cT1-T2N0 17 (27.4)
 cT3-4N0 14 (22.5)
 cTanyN-positive 26 (41.9)
 cTanyNanyM-positive 5
Surgical procedure* 59
 Segmental 41 (69.5)
  Low anterior resection 25
  Coloanal anastomosis 5
  Abdominal perineal resection/partial or total pelvic exenteration 11
 Extended 11 (18.6)
  Near-TPC, ileo–low rectal anastomosis 4
  TPC, IPAA 2
  TPC, end ileostomy 5
 Local excision 7 (11.9)
Neoadjuvant therapy (fluorouracil and long-course radiation) 30 (75% of 40 patients with cT3 to 4 or cN-positive)

Abbreviations: IPAA, ileal pouch anal anastomosis; IQR, interquartile range; MMR, mismatch repair; TPC, total proctocolectomy.

*

Three patients declined surgical resection because of: complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy (one), metastatic progression (one), and concurrent lymphoma (one).