Table 2.
Prevalence, knowledge and perceptions on prevalence of tungiasis
Variable | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Household infested with Tunga penetrans (n = 422) | ||
No | 327 | 77.5 |
Yes | 95 | 22.5 |
Household infested with Tunga penetrans in past one month (n = 422) | ||
No | 247 | 58.5 |
Yes | 175 | 41.5 |
Infestation period (n = 177) | ||
Less than a month | 90 | 50.8 |
More than a month | 87 | 49.2 |
Tunga penetrans a common problem (n =422) | ||
No | 235 | 55.7 |
Yes | 187 | 44.3 |
Perceptions aboutinfested individuals or families (n = 422) | ||
Are lazy | 130 | 30.8 |
Are economically challenged | 136 | 32.2 |
Cursed families | 84 | 19.9 |
Irresponsible | 72 | 17.1 |
interventions and treatment of tungiasis (n = 422) | ||
Chemicals like paraffin | 23 | 5.5 |
Using a pin, needle, thorn | 382 | 90.5 |
Household heads do not know any intervention | 17 | 4.0 |
Practicing preventivemeasuresfor tungiasis (n = 422) | ||
No | 168 | 39.8 |
Yes | 254 | 60.2 |