Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2016 Jul 9;29(3):367–388. doi: 10.1177/0898264316635587

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regression Models for Cognitive and Functional Performance Outcomes

Variables Model 1 Model 2

β 95% CI
(LB,UB)
R2 t β 95% CI (LB,UB) R2 t
Executive Function Composite+

Age .29 (.04, .06) 9.14** .30 (.04, .06) 9.49**
Sex .05 (−.03, .23) 1.57 .07 (.05,.31) 2.25*
Education −.26 (−.12,−.07) −8.02** −.24 (−.11, −.07) −7.43**
CES-D+ .17 (.02,.03) 5.17**
R2 .14 .17
ΔR2 .03

Speed of Processing Composite

Age −.39 (−.07, −.06) −13.37** −.40 (−.08, −.06) −13.86**
Sex −.12 (−.36, −.12) −4.00* −.14 (−.40, −.17) −4.83**
Education .30 (.08, .13) 8.61** .28 (.08, .12) 9.43**
CES-D+ −.19 (−.04, −.02) −6.36**
R2 .25 .28
ΔR2 .03

Memory Composite

Age −.21 (−.05, −.02) −6.55** −.21 (−.05, −.03) −6.85**
Sex −.13 (−.39, −.14) −4.10** −.15 (−.44, −.18) −4.86**
Education .27 (.08, .13) 8.62** .25 (.07, .12) 7.91**
CES-D+ −.18 (−.04, −.02) −5.79**
R2 .12 .15
ΔR2 .03

Functional Performance

Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Composite+

Age .38 (.03, .04) 12.27** .38 (03, .04) 12.35**
Sex .14 (.09, .24) 4.47** .15 (.10, .25) 4.70**
Education −.17 (−.05, −.03) −5.56** −.16 (−.05, −.02) −5.25**
CES-D+ .06 (.00, .01) 2.02*
R2 .18 .19
ΔR2 .01

Note: CES-D – Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale;

+

Lower scores reflect better performance; Executive function, speed of processing, and memory composite scores derived from factor analyses

*

p ≤ .05,

**

p < .001