Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;45(6):635–648. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0778-5

Table 1.

Information regarding the literature data compiled for the review part of this study. The methods are described using four categories: a. how the primary productivity values were measured; b. where (in situ or lab) and for how long the samples were incubated; c. how daily values were obtained (if given); and d. if the sediment/bottom substrate were undisturbed (“intact”) or disturbed (“slurry”). Data from the studies denoted with * are used in the calculations of the coastal and whole-system production in the Öre estuary and Bothnian Bay

ID Location Substrate Depths (m) Method (a–d) Source
1 Bothnian Bay Soft sediment and rocks 2, 4, 8 a. DIC; b. in situ, 24 h; c. incubation time; d. intact This study*
2 Bothnian Bay Sand 0.5–1 a. O2; b. in situ, 2–4 h; c. light factor; d. intact Kautsky and Foberg (2001)*
3 Baltic Proper Sandy sediments 0.5, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 5 a. 14C; b. in situ, 2–3 h; c. insolation values; d. intact Vilbaste et al. (2000)
4 Baltic Proper Sand 0.5 a. O2; b. in situ, 4 h; c. not given; d. slurry Urban-Malinga and Wiktor (2003)
5 Baltic Proper Soft mud/sand 0.6, 3.4 a. O2; b. in situ, 4–5 h; c. not given; d. intact Meyercordt and Meyer-Reil (1999)
6 Kattegat Sand/silt 3.5, 6.5, 11.5, 15, 17.5, 19.5 a. 14C; b. lab, 2 h; c. P-I curves; d. slurry Sundbäck and Jönsson (1988)
7 Kattegat Soft mud/silt 2 a. O2; b. in situ, 3–6 h; c. daylight duration; d. intact Gazeau et al. (2005)
8 Skagerrak Sand 0.5, 4 a. 14C; b. in situ, 2–3 h; c. insolation values; d. intact Sundbäck et al. (1996)
9 Baltic Proper Soft sediments 4 a. O2; b. in situ, 24 h; c. incubation time; d. intact Jansson and Wulff (1977)*