Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;5(2):110–116. doi: 10.15420/AER.2016.12.2

Table 1: Strategies to Reduce Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapies and Their Effect on Mortality.

Strategy to Reduce Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Impact on Shock Reduction Mortality Impact
Strategic ICD programming 50 % reduction in inappropriate therapy No difference in appropriate shocks 30 % reduction in mortality
Remote monitoring ECOST RCT: 71 % reduction in all shocks and 52 % reduction in inappropriate shocks from the ECOST trial No difference in mortality
IN-TIME RCT 1-year results: Shock occurrence not reported Reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.36)
Unclear impact of reduced shocks on mortality in both trials
Antiarrhythmic drugs 48 % reduction in combined endpoint of mortality and first shock at 1-year with sotalol in RCT No difference in mortality between sotalol versus placebo
OPTIC RCT 1-year results: amiodarone plus β-blocker versus β-blocker (HR 0.27). Amiodarone plus β-blocker versus sotalol (HR 0.43) No difference in mortality between groups
Catheter ablation SMASH-VT RCT 2-year results: Reduction of appropriate therapy (HR 0.35) No difference in mortality
VTACH RCT 2-year results: Higher freedom from VT/VF (HR 0.61) No difference in mortality

ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ECOST = Effectiveness and Cost of ICDs Follow-up Schedule with Telecardiology; IN-TIME = The Influence of Home Monitoring on the Clinical Status of Heart Failure Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function; OPTIC = Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients; RCT = randomised controlled trial; SMASH-VT = Substrate Mapping and Ablation in Sinus rhythm to Halt Ventricular Tachycardia; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VT = ventricular tachycardia; VTACH = Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Addition to Implantable Defibrillators in Coronary Heart Disease.