Table 3.

Regions showing significant activation for mental state evaluation as contrasted with harm evaluation^a

Region	Talairach coordinates			t	p	Size	Linear contrast		Contrast with MS difficulty		MS decoding
	X	Y	Z				F	p	F	p	t	p
R middle temporal gyrus	50	−35	−3	6.60	1.0E-6	81	0.00	1.00	0.21	0.47	−1.83	0.21
R TPJ	50	−53	18	8.10	<1.0E-6	275	0.69	0.34	2.12c	0.08c	1.71	0.21
R STS	53	−32	−1	6.59	<1.0E-6	77	0.01	1.00	0.29	0.64	0.24	0.94
PCC	−4	−56	30	7.01	<1.0E-6	221	7.14c	4.8E-3c	1.73	0.10	0.12	0.94
R caudate	8	4	18	4.47	1.9E-4	13	0.09	1.00	0.12	0.53	−0.49	0.93
R DMPFC	11	37	51	5.84	7.0E-6	17	0.44	0.48	3.39c	0.05c	1.82	0.21
L DMPFC	−7	41	51	7.03	<1.0E-6	620	0.30	0.62	2.30c	0.08c	−3.06	0.08
L medial frontal gyrus	−4	−17	54	4.21	3.6E-4	20	1.50	0.15	0.71	0.22	−0.39	0.93
L caudate	−16	4	15	5.01	5.2E-5	52	0.35	0.56	0.16	0.51	−2.63	0.10
L IFG	−46	28	−3	6.98	1.0E-6	50	7.19b	4.6E-3b	8.34c	7.6E-3c	−1.66	0.21
L STS	−52	7	−22	11.47	<1.0E-6	266	8.20b	2.7E-3b	13.09c	1.5E-3c	−1.61	0.21
L TPJ	−43	−59	21	9.13	<1.0E-6	473	2.17b	0.09b	4.16c	0.04c	−0.08	0.94

^aWhole-brain contrast corrected at q(FDR) = 0.05. Linear contrast column presents results of repeated-measures ANOVA with a linear contrast. Contrast with MS difficulty column presents the results of a repeated-measures ANOVA with a contrast based on mental state difficulty (Ginther et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2011). MS decoding column presents the results of a t test compared with chance level decoding of mental state level in each region. All sizes are in units of functional voxels. All ROI analyses corrected for multiple comparisons.

^bSignificance at p < 0.1.

^cIf both contrasts account for the data, significantly more consistent with the data than the other contrast (Rosnow and Rosenthal, 1996).