Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 24;2016:3619159. doi: 10.1155/2016/3619159

Table 2.

Success rates of laryngeal tubes in in-hospital airway management by different providers (physicians, paramedics, basic life support nurses, and paramedic students).

Authors Study Device Healthcare provider n FPIS OPIS
[n, (%)] 95% CI [n, (%)] 95% CI
Schalk et al., 2008 [60] p, in-hospital, elective LTS-D Physicians, paramedics 54 NS 53, 98.1 94.6%–100.0%
Gruber et al., 2014 [57] p, in-hospital, elective LTS-D BLS nurses 50 NS 39, 78.0 66.5%–89.5%
Kurola et al., 2005 [59] p, in-hospital, elective LT Paramedics 15 11, 73.3 51.0%–95.7% 15, 100.0 81.9%–100.0%
Kurola et al., 2006 [58] p, in-hospital, elective LT Paramedics students 32 14, 43.8 26.6%–60.9% 25, 78.1 63.8%–92.4%

Cumulative sum (n)  151 25, 47 132, 151
(%) 53.2 38.9%–67.5% 87.4 82.1%–92.7%

NS: not stated; p: prospective; r: retrospective; elective: nonemergency patient; BLS: basic life support; FPIS: first-pass insertion success; OPIS: overall-pass insertion success. If the success rate was 100%, it was assumed that the lower confidence interval (CI) was reached and that the next attempt would fail.