Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 7;6:32527. doi: 10.1038/srep32527

Table 1. Fits of the main SEMs tested.

Model χ2 df RMSEA CFI SB AIC
Single-factor (A), e.g., Berry et al.37 645 27 0.270 0.722 1.080 2838
Two-factor (B), e.g., Squire38 424 26 0.220 0.821 1.032 2580
Two-factor (C), e.g., Gardiner et al.39 340 26 0.196 0.859 1.001 2483
Two-factor (D), e.g., Yonelinas24 324 23 0.211 0.855 0.940 2472
Three-factor (E) 78 24 0.084 0.976 0.946 2220
             
Three Factor with Age 80 30 0.072 0.980 0.946 2928
             
Three Factor with Age & Edu 94 36 0.071 0.977 0.953 3778
             
Three Factor with Age, Edu & gF 214 78 0.074 0.957 0.977 6725
             
Three Factor with GM and WM ROIs* 118 72 0.046 0.981 0.982 7815
Three Factor with GM constrained* 142 78 0.052 0.974 0.983 7828
Three Factor with WM constrained* 135 78 0.049 0.977 0.984 7821
             
Three Factor with GM, WM and Age* 139 85 0.046 0.979 0.980 8282
Three Factor with WM, Age, GM-nulled* 159 94 0.048 0.974 0.979 8283
Three Factor with GM, Age, WM-nulled* 149 94 0.044 0.972 0.985 8273

The SEMs are grouped according to those fitting the same data (same observed variables), since one cannot compare all model fit indices across fits to different data. Edu = Education Level; gF = Fluid Intelligence; GM = Gray Matter (Volume); WM = White Matter (Index). For fit measures, see Methods (df = degrees of freedom left in data). *=These models additionally contained Education and TIV (affecting all memory factors). Note that the χ2 reported is the Satorra-Bentler scaled χ2, with the scaling factor reported as SB.