Table 2.
Description of the Global Trigger Tool and Harvard Medical Practice Study
Instrument | Description | Safety outcomes | Conducted by | Scale |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global Trigger Tool34 | Two-stage retrospective record review | |||
Stage 1: Screening records for the presence of triggers and determining the adverse event that caused harm to patients | Triggers (mostly narrow) | Stage 1: Trained nurses or hospital pharmacists (primary reviewers, mostly two reviewers per records) Maximum 20 min per record |
Dichotomous: yes/no trigger | |
Stage 2: Confirming or dismissing the occurrence and category of the adverse event | Adverse events | Stage 2: Trained physicians (second reviewers, mostly one reviewer) | Dichotomous: yes/no AE Definition of AE: Any unintended physical injury resulting from or contributed to by medical care that requires additional monitoring, treatment or hospitalisation or that results in death |
|
Medical record review based on HMPS3 | Two-stage or three-stage retrospective record review | |||
Stage 1: Screening records using criteria | (Broad) Screening criteria (triggers) | Stage 1: Trained nurses* No time limit |
Dichotomous: yes/no trigger | |
Stage 2: Detailed review to confirm the presence of adverse events and their preventability | (Preventable) Adverse events | Stage 2: Trained physicians (one or two reviewers per record) | AE determination is based on three criteria:
When criteria 1 and 2 are met and the score on criteria 3 is ≥4, then there has been an AE and an AE is preventable when the score on the preventability scale is ≥4 |
|
Stage 3: Discussion or independently supervising review (consensus stage)† | Stage 3: Supervising physician |