Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;17(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1571-2

Table 3.

Number (%) of trials using different methods of analysis to account for clustering

All trials
(n = 86)
Trials with <40 clustersa
(n = 56)
Trials with 40+ clustersa
(n = 29)
Cluster-level or individual-level analysis (if adjusted for clusters)
 Cluster-level 8 (9) 6 (11) 2 (7)
 Individual-level 77 (90) 50 (89) 26 (90)
 Unclear 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (3)
Analysis type if at individual level
 Mixed-effects model 46/77 (60) 31/50 (62) 15/26 (58)
 GEE 21/77 (27) 14/50 (28) 6/26 (23)
 Other 2/77 (3) 2/50 (4) 0/26 (0)
 Unclear 8/77 (10) 3/50 (6) 5/26 (19)
Used a degree-of-freedom correction for mixed-effects model
 Yes 0/46 (0) 0/31 (0) 0/15 (0)
 No 0/46 (0) 0/31 (0) 0/15 (0)
 Unclear 46/46 (100) 31/31 (100) 15/15 (100)
Used a small-sample correction for GEEs – number (%)
 Yes 0/21 (0) 0/14 (0) 0/6 (0)
 No 0/21 (0) 0/14 (0) 0/6 (0)
 Unclear 21/21 (100) 14/14 (100) 6/6 (100)

aOne trial was excluded as the number of clusters was not reported

GEE generalised estimating equation