Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 4;20(3):256–260. doi: 10.5114/wo.2015.55272

Table 1.

Evaluation of the cosmesis and satisfaction

Evaluation Early, n (%) Late, n (%) P-value/effect size
Number of patients 82 61
Cosmetic evaluation by the surgeon
 Excellent
 Good
 Moderate
 Poor
26 (31.7)
38 (46.3)
14 (17.1)
4 (4.9)






Cosmetic evaluation by the patient
 Excellent (4)
 Good (3)
 Moderate (2)
 Poor (1)
26 (31.7)
43 (52.4)
12 (14.6)
1 (1.2)
18 (29.5)
31 (50.8)
8 (13.1)
4 (6.6)



Patient score (mean ± SD) 3.15 ±0.67 3.0 ±0.80 0.08/0.88
Cosmetic evaluation by the panel
 Excellent
 Good
 Moderate
 Poor



15 (24.6)
31 (50.8)
12 (19.7)
3 (4.9)



Patients’ satisfaction
 9–10
 7–8
 5–6
 3–4
 1–2
65 (79.3)
13 (15.9)
3 (3.7)
1 (1.2)
0
46 (75.4)
7 (11.5)
6 (9.8)
2 (3.3)
0




Satisfaction score (mean ± SD) 9.1 ±1.37 8.8 ±1.59 0.03/0.11