Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 18;21(10):2289–2296. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1630

Table 2.

Clinical melanoma subtype, associated KIT alterations, clinical response to prior therapy with a KIT inhibitor and clinical response to nilotinib in those without CNS involvement (Cohort A).

Study
Subject
#
Melano
ma
Subtype
KIT
Mutatio
n
KIT
Amplificati
on
Prior
KIT
Inhibito
r+
RECIS
T
Respons
e to
Prior
KIT
Inhibito
r
PFS to
Prior
KIT
Inhibito
r
(Month
s)
RECIST
Respons
e to
Nilotinib
(Best
Percent
Respons
e)
PFS to
Nilotini
b
(Month
s)
1 Mucosal Exon 17
D820Y
Present
(qPCR)
Imatinib PR 3.8 SD
(−26%)
3.6
2x Acral Exon 13
K642E
Present
(FISH)
Imatinib uPR 4.1 PD
(6%)*
0.8
3 Mucosal Exon 11
L576P
Not Present
(FISH)
Imatinib PR 12.4 PR
(−59%)
37.5+
5 Mucosal None Present
(qPCR)
Imatinib SD 11.5 Clinical
PD
0.9
8 CSD Exon 17
N822K
Present
(FISH)
Imatinib SD 8.3 SD
(0%)
3.3
9 Mucosal Exon 13
R643Q
and
K642E
Not tested Imatinib Unk Unk SD
(14%)
3.9
11 CSD Exon 11
V559C
Present
(FISH)
Imatinib SD 16 Ineval 0.1
12 Mucosal Exon 11
L576P
Present
(qPCR)
Imatinib PR 7 Clinical
PD
1.8
13 Acral Exon 11
WKVV
E
557–561
Not tested Imatinib SD 8 PD*
(18%)
2.1
14 Mucosal Exon 13
K642E
Not tested Imatinib SD 3 SD
(−22%)
5.5
20 Mucosal Exon 13
K642E
Present
(qPCR)
Imatinib CR 20 PR
(−54%)
11.5

Abbreviations: qPCR – quantitative polymerase chain reaction

+

- All patients previously treated with a KIT inhibitor experienced progression on those agents and were not enrolled onto this study due to intolerance of prior therapy

x

– Patient 2 also received sorafenib; however, his response to this therapy is not known.

*

- Signifies the development of progression in non-target lesions or the development of new lesions