Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;12(8):20160323. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0323

Table 1.

Factors influencing: (1) the proportion of time subject lions spent looking in the call direction and (2) the proportion of time subject lions spent moving, following the playback of an incongruent, rather than congruent, call. Model parameters were generated using model averaging on the optimal GLMMs selected using corrected Akaike information criterion (models 1 : 3; electronic supplementary material, table SII).

dependent variable parameter estimate s.e Wald confidence interval: 2.5–97.5% relative importance
proportion of time looking in call direction intercept −2.105 0.368 0.06–0.26a
treatment congruent 1.00
incongruent 1.905 0.040 6.19–7.29a
sex female 0.26
male −0.263 0.793 0.15–3.85
treatment * sex female * congruent 0.06
male * incongruent 0.044 0.107 0.84–1.30
dependent variable parameter estimate s.e Wald confidence interval: 2.5–97.5% relative importance
proportion of time moving intercept −4.868 0.838 0.001–0.04a
treatment congruent 1.00
incongruent 2.094 0.102 6.60–9.99a
sex female 0.27
male −0.690 1.811 0.01–19.89
treatment * sex female x congruent 0.06
male x incongruent −0.141 0.207 0.57–1.32

aSignificant terms.