Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 7;95(3):537–545. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0776

Table 1.

Positive cases of tick-borne relapsing fever in Dielmo and Ndiop occurred before and during the preventive control strategy of borreliosis

Annual monitoring Diagnostic method No. of borreliosis cases/village Incidence/100 person-year
TBS and/or PCR Dielmo Ndiop Dielmo Ndiop
1990 (June in Dielmo) TBS 5 3.57
1991 TBS 8 3.63
1992 TBS 9 4.03
1993 (July in Ndiop) TBS 9 0 3.69 0
1994 TBS 9 0 3.7 0
1995 TBS 11 0 4.53 0
1996 TBS 44 0 16.06 0
1997 TBS 65 0 24.92 0
1998 TBS 56 0 20.35 0
1999 TBS 52 0 19.24 0
2000 TBS 55 0 19.15 0
2001 TBS 37 0 13.14 0
2002 TBS 25 0 8.93 0
2003 TBS 10 0 3.56 0
2004 TBS 21 0 6.96 0
2005 TBS 28 0 10.22 0
2006 TBS 53 0 18.73 0
2007 TBS 39 0 12.06 0
2008 TBS/PCR QIAGEN (December)* 17 0 4.77 0
2009 TBS/PCR QIAGEN 35 0 8.58 0
2010 TBS/PCR POC (November) 36 5 9.78 6.04
2011 PCR 35 19 9.57 5.95
2012 PCR 34 14 9.08 4.08
Total cases of any method 693 38 10.55 3.79
Average annual 31 (30.8) 10 (9.5) 10.55 3.79
January and February 2013 (before intervention) 4 3
Intervention period March 2013 (10 months) 10 8 2.58 2.16
2013 (for all cases detected) 14 11 3.64 3.04
2014 (intervention, monitoring, and tracking of risk factors) 12 3 3.13 0.78
January to September 2015 (9 months) 4 3 1.07 0.72
Cases during the intervention period (March 2013 to September 2015) 26 14 2.63 1.39
Average cases in course of intervention 10 (10.07) 5 (5.42) 2.63 1.39

PCR = polymerase chain reaction, POC = point-of-care, TBS = thick blood smear.

*

DNA extraction from patients with fever using QIAGEN columns.

PCR in Dielmo POC laboratory.

Cases occurred in the intervention period of 2 years 7 months.