Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr 23;221(2):430–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.010

Table 4.

Binary Logistic Regression, Factors Associated with Pathological Complete Response

Characteristic Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Value
nCRT to surgery interval, wk
 6 – 8 Reference
 < 6 0.79 (0.68–0.91) 0.0009
 > 8 1.12 (1.02 – 1.28) 0.04
Rectal cancer resections annually, n
 1 – 10 Reference
 11 – 30 1.20 (0.95–1.51) 0.12
 ≥ 30 1.42 (1.12–1.80) 0.004
Treatment regimen
 RT, 1 chemo agent Reference
 RT, ≥2 chemo agents 0.76 (0.68–0.85) <0.0001
Radiation dose, Gy
 <45 Reference
 ≥ 45 1.28 (0.99. 1.65) <0.06
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma Reference
 Mucinous 0.13 (0.08–0.22) <0.001
 Signet ring cell 0.78 (0.42–1.47) 0.45
Clinical stage
 II Reference
 III 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.008
Tumor size, mm
 0 – 25 Reference
 25 – 40 1.14 (1.01, 1.28) 0.04
 40 – 50 1.18 (1.02, 1.38) 0.03
 >50 1.43 (1.24, 1.66) <0.0001
Female sex 1.22 (1.10–1.36) 0.0002
Primary payer
 Private Reference
 Not Insured 0.60 (0.44–0.80) 0.005
 Medicaid 0.67 (0.52–0.85) 0.001
 Medicare 1.03 (0.89–1.19) 0.74
 Other government 1.22 (0.78–1.92) 0.38
Year of diagnosis
 2006 Reference
 2007 1.11 (0.88–1.39) 0.40
 2008 1.05 (0.84–1.31) 0.66
 2009 1.28 (1.04–1.59) 0.02
 2010 1.31 (1.07–1.62) 0.01
 2011 1.56 (1.28–1.92) <0.001

Model also controlled for age, race, average income and education by zip code, hospital type and hospital location.

OR, odds ratio; nCRT, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; RT, radiotherapy.