Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Mar 11;264:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.006

Table 1.

Comparative surgery time, recovery time, and success rates

Method Surgery Range (min) Surgery Avg ± SEM (min) Recovery Range (min) Recovery Avg ± SEM (min) Success (n) Success (%)
Novel s.c. bif. catheter hindpaw delivery system --- --- --- --- 42 100.00
Traditional i.t. catheter delivery system (original catheter) 26–53 37±1.2 3–40 13±1.2 29 46.30
Traditional i.t. catheter delivery system (customized catheter) 27–43 35±1.9 9–24 15±1.5 8 53.33
O’Buckley i.t. catheter delivery system (customized catheter) 16–52 30±1.8* 2–16 5±0.65* 64 85.33