Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2015 May 5;8(2):1030–1069. doi: 10.1137/140984002

Table 5.

Obtained values for det(F1h) of exemplary registration results of the convergence study reported in Table 2 with respect to different iterative optimization methods (Picard, N-PCG, and GN-PCG). We refer to Table 4 and the text for details on the experimental setup. We report results for plain H2-regularization (γ = 0; top block) and for the Stokes regularization scheme (γ = 1; H1-regularization; bottom block) for a grid size of nx = (256, 256).

min(det(F1h))
max(det(F1h))
mean(det(F1h))
std(det(F1h))
H2-regularization Picard 8.81E–1 1.19 1.00 7.58E–2
GN-PCG 8.83E–1 1.19 1.00 7.56E–2
N-PCG 8.83E–1 1.19 1.00 7.54E–2
Stokes regularization Picard 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.55E–12
GN-PCG 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.52E–12
N-PCG 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.52E–12