Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2015 May 5;8(2):1030–1069. doi: 10.1137/140984002

Table 7.

Values for the determinant of the deformation gradient det(F1h) for exemplary results of the convergence study reported in Table 6. We report results for the Picard and the GN-PCG method. We refer to Table 6 and the text for details on the experimental setup. We report results for the Stokes regularization scheme (γ = 1; H1-regularization). The regularization parameter is set to β = 1E–3. The grid size is nx = (256, 256). These results directly relate to those reported for the smooth registration problem (see section 5.3.2, in particular Table 5).

min(det(F1h))
max(det(F1h))
mean(det(F1h))
std(det(F1h))
Picard 10.00E–1 1.00 1.00 2.03E–5
GN-PCG 10.00E–1 1.00 1.00 2.29E–5