Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2014 Jun 27;69(3):315–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.06.003

Table 2.

Species datasets overlap and the extracted bicluster results summary.

Overlap Speciesa #Genesb #Samplesc #Biclustersd Avg MSRxe
Single f F 12,521 33 5 0.87
M 10,279 147 5 0.92
H 895 233 6 0.93
W 16,688 42 6 0.98

Pairwise g F,H 443 256 8 0.87
H,W 377 265 6 0.80
M,H 675 370 1 0.99
F,W 2,724 75 9 0.96 j
F,M 2,944 180 7 0.95 j
W,M 2,240 189 8 0.88

Triplet h F,W,M 1,637 222 7 0.92 j
H,F,M 341 403 0k
H,W,F 307 298 0k
H,W,M 286 412 0k

All i H,F,M,W 235 445 7 0.85
a

F: Fly; W: Worm; M: Mouse; H: Human.

b

The number of genes in the dataset.

c

The number of samples in the dataset.

d

Number of biclusters with gene counts and sample counts more than or equal5.

e

The average mean squared residue of for the chosen biclusters with gene counts and sample counts more than or equal 5.

f

The overlap of the datasets in each living species.

g

The overlap of the species datasets in pairs.

h

The overlap of the species datasets in triplets.

i

The overlap across all species.

j

The best MSR results in the overlapped datasets.

k

All of the extracted biclusters gene counts or sample counts less than 5.