Table 5.

The pairwise comparisons correlated to each other. Fold changes of two pairwise comparisons were used to calculate a correlation coefficient. This table listed pairs of the comparisons from different data sets or species having the strongest correlation to each other.

Comparison1	Dataset1	Species1	Comparison2	Dataset2	Species2	Na	Corrb
50nM Rotenone, 1 week	GSE35642	human	Mito patients muscle	GSE42986	human	11472	−0.42
5nM Rotenone, 4 weeks	GSE35642	human	Mito patients muscle	GSE42986	human	11472	0.39
Patients with CoQ10 def.	GSE33940	human	Mito patients muscle	GSE42986	human	17453	0.37
Sirt3 KO, standard diet	GSE30552	mouse	Mito patients muscle	GSE42986	human	16139	−0.37
Sirt3 KO, standard diet	GSE30552	mouse	Probucol treatment	GSE18677	mouse	16692	−0.35
Patients of 4977bp del	GSE1462	human	Mito patients muscle	GSE42986	human	11472	0.34
PGC1b KO in liver	GSE6210	mouse	Rotenone, 1 day old	GSE46051	worm	3153	0.32
PGC1a overexpression	GSE4330	mouse	PGC1a KO, standard diet	GSE34773	mouse	12941	−0.30

^aNumber of homolog gene clusters included by both comparisons;

^bPearson’s correlation coefficient between 2 sets of fold changes.