Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2016 Oct;26(10):445–452. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000235

Table 3.

Comparison of COAG and EU-PACT dose-initiation strategies among COAG study participants.

All participants Black participants Nonblack participants
Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing Clinically guided dosing Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing Clinically guided dosing Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing Clinically guided dosing
Difference in total dose over first 3 days of therapy between EU-PACT and COAG strategies *
(n=510) (n=500) (n=139) (n=134) (n=371) (n=366)
 Mean (SD), mg 4.8 (1.8) 2.5 (3.4) 6.4 (1.5) 0.1 (3.9) 4.2 (1.5) 3.4 (2.7)
Mean (SD) ratio of average initial dose to maintenance dose
(n=370) (n=349) (n=84) (n=89) (n=286) (n=260)
 COAG strategy 1.1 (0.4) 1.1 (0.4) 1.2 (0.5) 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.4) 1.1 (0.4)
 EU-PACT strategy 1.5 (0.5) 1.3 (0.6) 1.6 (0.6) 1.1 (0.4) 1.4 (0.5) 1.3 (0.6)

SD, standard deviation

*

For each COAG study participant (n=1,010), we first calculated the total dose over the first 3 days of therapy under the COAG and EU-PACT dose-initiation strategies. We then calculated the differences between strategies as the total dose under the EU-PACT strategy minus the total dose under the COAG strategy; a positive difference indicated a larger total dose under the EU-PACT dose-initiation strategy.

For each COAG study participant who achieved maintenance dose (n=719), we first calculated the total dose over the first 3 days of therapy under the COAG and EU-PACT dose-initiation strategies. We then divided the average dose over the first 3 days of therapy by the observed maintenance dose; a ratio of 1 indicated equality between the average initial dose and the maintenance dose.