Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2016 Mar 29;196(3):678–684. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.144

Table 5.

Analyses of Overall Survival (OS) for Patients with Metastatic Disease

Univariable Analyses Multivariable Analyses*

Patient
Characteristic
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
P-value Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
P-value
Synchronous
Metastases

  LN Positive Yes vs. No 1.5 (0.8, 2.8) 0.20 2.1 (1.1, 4.0) 0.03

  Clear Cell Clear Cell vs.
Other
1.2 (0.6, 2.3) 0.68 NI

  Metastasectomy** Yes vs. No 0.8 (0.4, 1.3) 0.35 0.9 (0.5, 1.5) 0.62

  ECOG Status*** ≥1 vs 0 1.5 (0.8, 2.8) 0.27 1.7 (0.9, 3.5) 0.13

  Tumor Stage 0.18 0.11
T3 vs T1/T2 1.8 (0.8, 4.0) 2.2 (1.0, 4.9)
T4 vs T1/T2 2.6 (0.9, 7.3) 3.1 (1.0, 9.7)

  Age >55 vs ≤55 1.0 (0.6, 1.7) 0.97 1.2 (0.7, 2.2) 0.54

Asynchronous
Metastases

  LN Positive Yes vs No 2.8 (1.1, 7.4) 0.03 3.3 (1.2, 9.2) 0.02

  Clear Cell Clear Cell vs.
Other
0.7 (0.2, 2.1) 0.47 NI

  Metastasectomy** Yes vs. No 0.6 (0.2, 1.5) 0.29 0.5 (0.2, 1.4) 0.17

  Tumor Stage 0.96 NI
T3 vs T1/T2 1.2 (0.4, 3.5)
T4 vs T1/T2 1.1 (0.3, 3.6)

  Age >55 vs ≤55 0.7 (0.3, 1.9) 0.50 1.0 (0.4, 2.6) 0.94
*

There were 53 events among patients with synchronous metastasis so only 5 covariates were included in the multivariate model, with selection based on clinical relevance. For patients with asynchronous metastasis, there were only 19 events so only 3 factors were included in the multivariate model based on clinical relevance.

**

Since patients with and without metastasectomy were matched pairs where the patient without metastasectomy lived at least to the time the metastasectomy was performed, no adjustment is made for metastasectomy occurring after nephrectomy.

***

ECOG performance status was measured at nephrectomy and was not recorded separately at the time of later metastasis diagnosis; therefore it was not included for patients with asynchronous metastasis.