Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 2;474(10):2190–2199. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x

Table 4.

Characteristics of 37 revisions directly related to ceramic use

Reasons Bearing type and diameter of bearing and cup being revised
Ceramic head rupture* (n = 8) 6 Al/Al: 3 in 28 mm (cup diameters were 48 mm, 56 mm, and 60 mm), 2 in 32 mm (cup diameters were 54 mm and NA), 1 in 36 mm (cup was 60 mm)
2 Delta/Delta: 1 in 32 mm (cup was 58 mm), 1 in 36 mm (cup was 60 mm)
Insert rupture* (n = 4) 2 Al/Al: one in 32 mm (cup 50 mm) and one in 36 mm (cup 56 mm)
2 Delta/Delta: one in 28 mm (cup 52 mm) and one in 36 mm (cup 52 mm)
Ceramic sandwich fracture (n = 11) Al/Al sandwich, all 28 mm
Squeaking (n = 6) 6 Al/Al (5 in 32 mm and 1 in 36 mm)
Prosthetic impingement (n = 7) 2 Al/Al 28 mm
1 Al/Al 32 mm
1 Delta/Delta 32 mm
3 Delta/Delta 36 mm
Incorrect insert introduction 1 Al/Al 32 mm

* Cup diameter indicated in cases of ceramic component breakage; Al/Al = alumina-on-alumina; NA = not available.