Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40644-016-0087-z

Table 3.

Detailed representation of results in the different assessment modes

Column 1 2 3 4 5 6
Row 1 Conventional consensual assessment by specialists Software assessment Software-assessment corrected by specialists
2 Number (n) inguinal (“true”)
Lynph Nodes (LNs)
83 128 83
3 R/L 47/36 65/63 42/41
4 Median 3 5 3
5 Range 0–6 0–12 0–9
6 pelvic (“true”) LNs 44 87 60
7 R/L 27/17 51/36 39/21
8 Median 1 1 1
9 Range 0–8 0–13 0–11
10 all (“true”) LNs 127 215 143
11 R/L 74/53 116/99 81/62
12 Median 5 6 4
13 Range 0–13 1–19 0–15
14 all (“false”) LNs - 588 660
15 Median - 20 22
16 Range - 3–74 3–78
17 all (“true”) and (“false”) LNs (findings) 127 803 803
18 Median 5 29 29
19 Range 0–13 6–80 6–80
20 Required assessment time (min) Average 14.6 0.91 4.4
21 Median 14.7 0.93 4.2
22 Range 12.3–17.7 0.7–1.0 2.3–7.9