Table 5.

Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Framingham and 10‐year ASCVD Risk Scoring Systems for the Alignment of Statin Therapy in Subjects According to CAC Score Progression

	Framingham Risk Scoring				2013 ASCVD Risk Scoring				P Valuea
	Cutoff	Sensitivity	Specificity	AUC (95% CI)	Cutoff	Sensitivity	Specificity	AUC (95% CI)
Progression	5	76.2	48.6	0.66 (0.63–0.68)	4.19	79.5	49.3	0.67 (0.64–0.70)	0.056

ASCVD indicates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; AUC, area under the curve.

^a P value between Framingham and 10‐year ASCVD risk scoring system. P value is calculated by comparison of AUCs using the method of DeLong et al.¹⁰