Table 2.

SUTAQ results for clusters 2, 5, 7 at 3 and 12 months after the intervention and results for cluster 8 at 12 months. Two subscale, “Privacy and discomfort” and “Care personnel concerns”, have inverted scores thus a low value implies a positive view towards these aspects of telemonitoring.

	CLUSTER 2 (DIABETES) N = 163 90.6% on target			CLUSTER 5 (COPD) N = 180 85.3% on target			CLUSTER 7 (CHF) N = 140 73.7% on target			CLUSTER 8 (PM/ICD) N = 1635, 87,4% on target
Subscale	Intervention after 3 months	Intervention after 12 months	P value (< 0.05)	Intervention after 3 months	Intervention after 12 months	P value (< 0.05)	Intervention after 3 months	Intervention after 12 months	P value (< 0.05)	Intervention after 12 months
	Median (interquartile range)	Median (interquartile range)		Median (interquartile range)	Median (interquartile range)		Median (interquartile range)	Median (interquartile range)		Median (interquartile range)
Enhanced care	5.4 (5.2–5.8)	5,8 (5,2–6)	<0.001	5.4 (4.8–5.8)	5.6 (5–6)	0.02	5.6 (5–5.85)	5.8 (5.2–6)	0.05	5.8 (5.4–6)
Increased accessibility	5 (4.5–5.25)	5 (4,75–5,5)	<0.001	5 (4–5.5)	4.75 (4.25–5.25)	0.26	5 (4.5–5.25)	5 (4.45–5.5)	0.37	5.5 (5–5.75)
Privacy and discomfort	1 (1–1.25)	1 (1–1,25)	0.79	1 (1–1.25)	1 (1–1.75)	0.14	1.25 (1–2)	1 (1–1.25)	<0.001	1 (1–1)
Care personnel concerns	1 (1–1.66)	1,66 (1–2,33)	<0.001	2 (1.33–2.66)	2.33 (1.33–2.3)	0.39	2 (1–2.66)	1.66 (1–2.33)	0.34	1 (1–1.33)
Kit as substitution	3 (2.66–3.33)	2,66 (2–3)	<0.001	2.66 (2–3.33)	2.33 (2–3)	0.20	2.66 (2.33–3)	2.66 (2–3)	0.50	2.33 (2–2.66)
Satisfaction	6 (5.66–6)	6 (5,66–6)	0.91	5.66 (5.66–6)	6 (5.66–6)	0.01	6 (5.33–6)	6 (5.66–6)	0.05	6 (5.66–6)