Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 9;26(5):348–354. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.006

Table 2.

Mixed Effect Models Predicting Change in Log Base 10 Relative Abundance of Each Phylum with D2T Score, Dentition, Smoking Household, and Urban Water.

Phyla Mixed Effects Models (n=173 saliva specimens)
Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Proteobacteria Actinobacteria Fusobacteria TM7 Other Spirochaetes
Phyla relative abundance (%) 36% 26% 24% 11% 3% 0.5% 0.2% 0.1%
Random Effects Variance
Family 0.007 0.015 0.025 0.010 0.007 0.029 0.022 0.005
Residual 0.048 0.074 0.086 0.084 0.116 0.157 0.072 0.164
Fixed Effects Estimate(p-value)
Age 7-17 −.053 (0.27) 0.085 (0.17) −0.119 (.007) 0.050 (.43) −0.079 (0.29) 0.236 (0.008) 0.125 (.04) 0.089 (0.31)
Adult .074(0.08) 0.193 (0.000) −0.331 (<<0.001) 0.353 (<<0.001) −0.057 (0.376) 0.6518 (0.000) 0.377 (<<.001) 0.729 (0.000)
Household Smoking .0008(0.96) 0.0530 (0.24) 0.095(.05) −0.015 (.73) 0.103 (0.06) 0.015 (0.80) −0.043 (.34) 0.153 (0.017)
Active decay (D2T>0) .000006 (0.98) 0.005 (0.57) −0.001 (.88) 0.001 (.86) 0.002 (0.84) 0.010 (0.34) −0.010 (.21) 0.013 (0.25)