Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul;13(7):1057–1066. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-063OC

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of participants with classified emergency department visits or hospitalizations

  HCHS/SOL
MESA
ED Visits Hospitalizations Hospitalizations
Classified events, n 56 61 99
Primary discharge ICD diagnosis code      
 COPD (ICD-9 codes 496, 506.4; or ICD-10 code J44) 0 0 15 (15%)
 Emphysema (ICD-9 code 492 or ICD-10 code J43) 0 0 3 (3%)
 Bronchitis (ICD-9 codes 490–491 or ICD-10 codes J40–J42) 3 (5%) 1 (2%) 40 (40%)
 Asthma (ICD-9 code 493 or ICD-10 codes J45–J46) 17 (30%) 12 (20%) 41 (41%)
 Any CLRD 20 (36%) 13 (21%) 99 (100%)
Participants, n 50 56 75
Age, yr 51 (13) 54 (12) 67 (8.8)
Male sex 6 (15%) 17 (34%) 29 (39%)
Body mass index, kg/m2 31 (6) 32 (9) 30 (8)
Race/ethnicity      
 White 29 (39%)
 African American 24 (32%)
 Hispanic/Latino 50 (100%) 56 (100%) 15 (20%)
 Asian 7 (9%)
Smoking status      
 Never 23 (47%) 23 (43%) 19 (25%)
 Former 16 (33%) 14 (26%) 31 (41%)
 Current 10 (20%) 17 (32%) 25 (33%)
Pack-years of smoking 15 (15) 20.0 (17) 36.5 (26)
Self-reported CLRD      
 Asthma 36 (77%) 36 (68%) 36 (36%)
 COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis 17 (36%) 21 (40%) 12 (16%)
Baseline spirometry      
 FEV1, % predicted, L 74 (25) 76 (22) 68 (32)
 FEV1/FVC ratio 0.75 (0.11) 0.73 (0.12) 0.58 (0.17)
 Airflow limitation 14 (35%)* 15 (30%)* 24 (65%)
 Restrictive pattern 9 (23%)* 13 (26%)* 2 (5%)

Definition of abbreviations: CLRD = chronic lower respiratory disease; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ED = emergency department; HCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Airflow limitation is defined as a prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70. A restrictive pattern is defined as a prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.70 and an FVC percent predicted <80%.

Values are presented as mean (SD) or frequency (percent), with the percentages calculated out of participants with nonmissing data.

*

In HCHS/SOL, 88 of 102 participants with classified events had valid spirometric measures.

In MESA, 37 of 75 participants with classified events had valid spirometric measures that were performed in 2004–2006 (approximately 4 yr after baseline examination and initiation of event follow-up).