Table 4.
MBF in CAC and non-CAC myocardial territory
| MBF at rest | MBF during CPT | MBF during adenosine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole study group | |||
| CAC territory | 0.69±0.24 | 0.81±0.23 | 1.82±0.50 | 
| Non-CAC territory | 0.74±0.23* | 0.81±0.22 | 1.95±0.51* | 
| CON | |||
| CAC territory | 0.61 ±0.15 | 0.81±0.22 | 1.96±0.64 | 
| Non-CAC territory | 0.65±0.19* | 0.77±0.31 | 2.10±0.58 | 
| DM | |||
| CAC territory | 0.75±0.27 | 0.81±0.24 | 1.71 ±0.33 | 
| Non-CAC territory | 0.80±0.24* | 0.83±0.23 | 1.83±0.44 | 
| NDM | |||
| CAC territory | 0.61 ±0.13 | 0.73±0.19 | 1.76±0.34 | 
| Non-CAC territory | 0.68±0.13* | 0.77±0.13 | 1.98±0.48 | 
| HDM | |||
| CAC territory | 0.97±0.29 | 0.91±0.25 | 1.64±0.32 | 
| Non-CAC territory | 0.99±0.23 | 0.91±0.30 | 1.61 ±0.25 | 
Paired analysis of the vascular territory of the LAD, LCx and RCA CAC coronary artery calcification, CON controls, NDM normotensive diabetes mellitus, HDM hypertensive diabetes mellitus
p<0.02 vs. CAC territory