Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Aug 15;36(2):219–229. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0885-z

Table 4.

MBF in CAC and non-CAC myocardial territory

MBF at
rest
MBF during
CPT
MBF during
adenosine
Whole study group
 CAC territory 0.69±0.24 0.81±0.23 1.82±0.50
 Non-CAC territory 0.74±0.23* 0.81±0.22 1.95±0.51*
CON
 CAC territory 0.61 ±0.15 0.81±0.22 1.96±0.64
 Non-CAC territory 0.65±0.19* 0.77±0.31 2.10±0.58
DM
 CAC territory 0.75±0.27 0.81±0.24 1.71 ±0.33
 Non-CAC territory 0.80±0.24* 0.83±0.23 1.83±0.44
NDM
 CAC territory 0.61 ±0.13 0.73±0.19 1.76±0.34
 Non-CAC territory 0.68±0.13* 0.77±0.13 1.98±0.48
HDM
 CAC territory 0.97±0.29 0.91±0.25 1.64±0.32
 Non-CAC territory 0.99±0.23 0.91±0.30 1.61 ±0.25

Paired analysis of the vascular territory of the LAD, LCx and RCA CAC coronary artery calcification, CON controls, NDM normotensive diabetes mellitus, HDM hypertensive diabetes mellitus

*

p<0.02 vs. CAC territory