Table 4.
MBF in CAC and non-CAC myocardial territory
MBF at rest |
MBF during CPT |
MBF during adenosine |
|
---|---|---|---|
Whole study group | |||
CAC territory | 0.69±0.24 | 0.81±0.23 | 1.82±0.50 |
Non-CAC territory | 0.74±0.23* | 0.81±0.22 | 1.95±0.51* |
CON | |||
CAC territory | 0.61 ±0.15 | 0.81±0.22 | 1.96±0.64 |
Non-CAC territory | 0.65±0.19* | 0.77±0.31 | 2.10±0.58 |
DM | |||
CAC territory | 0.75±0.27 | 0.81±0.24 | 1.71 ±0.33 |
Non-CAC territory | 0.80±0.24* | 0.83±0.23 | 1.83±0.44 |
NDM | |||
CAC territory | 0.61 ±0.13 | 0.73±0.19 | 1.76±0.34 |
Non-CAC territory | 0.68±0.13* | 0.77±0.13 | 1.98±0.48 |
HDM | |||
CAC territory | 0.97±0.29 | 0.91±0.25 | 1.64±0.32 |
Non-CAC territory | 0.99±0.23 | 0.91±0.30 | 1.61 ±0.25 |
Paired analysis of the vascular territory of the LAD, LCx and RCA CAC coronary artery calcification, CON controls, NDM normotensive diabetes mellitus, HDM hypertensive diabetes mellitus
p<0.02 vs. CAC territory