Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;8(8):74–93. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p74

Table 3.

Quality of evidence*

Study Randomization; allocation concealment Losses > 20% Blinding Quality of evidence1 Intervention quality Quality of evidence1
Hosseinian (2012) -1 No information ---- -1 Low(-2)
Asadpour (2012) -1 No information ----- ----- Moderate(-1)
Zarepour (2010) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Salimi (2012) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Nasr Isfahani (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Etemadi (2006) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Ebrahimi (2011) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Rezaei (2013) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Shakarami (2014) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Ghadam Kheir (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Mazlomi (2012) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Etemadi (2014) -1 --- --- -1 Low(-2)
Hosseini Zand (2013) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Shariatzadeh (2014) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Oulia (2006) -1 --- --- -1 Low(-2)
Babaei Garmkhani (2014) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Botlani (2010) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Hosseini (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Nasr Isfahani (2010) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Bahrami (2009) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Durana (1997) -1 --- --- --- Moderate(-1)
Khanjani Veshki (2012) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Duffey (2004) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Nayari (2014) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Hajian (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Nasirnejhad Karaj (2014) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Mami (2015) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Farbod (2014) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Mohamadi (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Coutta (2001) -1 -1 --- --- Low(-2)
Nasirnejhad Tehran (2014) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Sharifian (2011) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Hickmon (1997) -1 No information +1 --- High(0)
Soltani (2013) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Denton (2000) -1 -1 --- --- Low(-2)
Karimi (2012) -1 No information --- -1 Low(-2)
Yousefi (2014) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
Momeni Javid (2014) -1 No information --- --- Moderate(-1)
*

Quality could be high, moderate, low, or very low. We considered these RCTs to be high quality then downgraded a level for each of the following: A) lack of information on random sequence, allocation concealed, or lack of allocation concealed B) low quality interventions (Table 2), c) loss of more than 20% at follow-up. We upgraded one level for the studies that performed some blinding.