Table 4.
Multivariate logistic regression models of consistent condom use (CCU) with both last occasional client and last regular client stratified by debt, savings, income, and housing status (N = 199)
| Variable | Debt | Savings | Income | Housing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Saved | Did not save | High | Low | Secure | Insecure | |
| Perceived risk for HIV | 5.57** (1.61, 19.24) |
2.23 (0.47, 10.55) |
3.07* (1.08, 8.68) |
7.31 (0.58, 91.62) |
7.83** (2.09, 29.27) |
1.32 (0.39, 4.52) |
4.13* (1.38, 12.38) |
1.16 (0.12, 11.28) |
| Participation in door-to-door mobilization | 10.56*** (2.44, 45.66) |
1.14 (0.23, 5.61) |
4.79* (1.47, 15.68) |
1.17 (0.12,11.88) |
3.71+
(0.94, 14.64) |
2.94 (0.73, 11.89) |
9.31** (2.53, 34.24) |
0.33 (0.01, 11.87) |
| Served as peer educator | 2.24 (0.59, 8.54) |
3.50 (0.59, 20.80) |
2.65+
(0.86, 8.17) |
4.36 (0.30, 63.66) |
3.85 (0.65, 22.78) |
3.14 (0.80, 12.37) |
4.15* (1.14, 15.05) |
1.78 (0.08, 36.76) |
| Number of days of sex work in the last week | 1.66** (1.17, 2.36) |
2.42* (1.21, 4.82) |
1.50** (1.11, 2.03) |
2.90* (1.16, 7.26) |
1.62* (1.08, 2.41) |
1.90** (1.22, 2.97) |
1.79** (1.27, 2.54) |
1.02 (0.49, 2.14) |
| Number of occasional clients × number of regular clients in the last week | 1.06 (0.98,1.16) |
1.24* (1.05, 1.47) |
1.01 (0.99, 1.14) |
1.44* (1.07, 1.94) |
1.06 (0.98, 10.14) |
1.20* (1.04, 1.38) |
1.00 (0.94, 10.35) |
1.48* (1.13, 1.96) |
| Pseudo-R2 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.68 |
Significance level + p < 0.10,* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p = 0.001