Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;53(4):979–1009. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0492-8

Table 2.

Effect of availability of legal abortion centers on contraceptive use and self-reported abortions

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Any Method Modern Method Female Sterilization Male Sterilization Modern Method Other Than Sterilization Traditional Method Ever Had an Abortion Share of All Pregnancies Aborted
Number of Abortion Centers in District 0.974** 0.974** 0.978* 0.999 0.976** 0.992 1.013 0.002**
(0.0065) (0.0072) (0.0109) (0.0106) (0.0041) (0.0071) (0.0080) (0.0002)
DHS 2001 1.759** 1.678** 1.339** 1.184 1.886** 1.552** 0.879 –0.002*
(0.1112) (0.0977) (0.0817) (0.1226) (0.1452) (0.2408) (0.1302) (0.0007)
DHS 2006 2.343** 2.293** 1.699** 1.105 2.681** 1.421* 1.900** 0.000
(0.2003) (0.1962) (0.2224) (0.1670) (0.2289) (0.2276) (0.3310) (0.0017)
DHS 2011 2.656** 2.410** 1.591** 1.289 2.987** 2.099** 3.216** 0.007**
(0.2303) (0.2249) (0.2330) (0.2110) (0.3140) (0.3676) (0.5636) (0.0025)
Urban 1.324** 1.256** 1.146 1.063 1.264** 1.231** 1.440** 0.009**
(0.0888) (0.0876) (0.1149) (0.1634) (0.0801) (0.0879) (0.1252) (0.0022)
Age 1.063** 1.059** 1.080** 1.091** 0.987** 1.026** 1.052** 0.000*
(0.0030) (0.0031) (0.0036) (0.0043) (0.0039) (0.0041) (0.0054) (0.0001)
Buddhist 0.679** 0.719** 0.419** 0.640** 1.227 0.735 1.200 0.004
(0.0533) (0.0670) (0.0724) (0.0925) (0.1583) (0.1172) (0.1800) (0.0028)
Muslim 0.257** 0.252** 0.112** 0.104** 0.936 0.717 0.504* –0.005*
(0.0422) (0.0427) (0.0254) (0.0623) (0.1824) (0.2240) (0.1559) (0.0026)
Christian 0.804 0.877 0.882 0.744 1.039 0.638 1.095 -0.001
(0.1776) (0.1889) (0.2585) (0.2481) (0.1503) (0.3410) (0.2868) (0.0057)
Other 0.498** 0.443** 0.232** 0.446* 0.822 1.223 0.861 –0.000
(0.0629) (0.0567) (0.0502) (0.1438) (0.0935) (0.1891) (0.1615) (0.0025)
Primary Education 1.236** 1.158** 0.869 1.658** 1.118 1.497** 2.232** 0.009**
(0.0700) (0.0654) (0.0626) (0.1596) (0.0653) (0.1484) (0.2263) (0.0017)
Secondary Education 1.331** 1.114 0.576** 1.352* 1.475** 2.360** 3.250** 0.024**
(0.0900) (0.0866) (0.0703) (0.1870) (0.1166) (0.2763) (0.4008) (0.0027)
Tertiary Education 1.305** 0.756* 0.219** 0.651 1.589** 5.381** 3.412** 0.041**
(0.1344) (0.0866) (0.0604) (0.1912) (0.1854) (0.8198) (0.6233) (0.0067)
District Dummy Variables Included? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Number of Observations 32,098 32,098 31,620 32,078 32,098 31,657 31,371 29,368
Number of Districts 75 75 72 74 75 70 70 75
Pseudo-R 2 .1102 .1014 .1982 .1604 .0971 .0818 .1327 .0626
Mean Value of Dependent Variable 0.431 0.388 0.158 0.068 0.163 0.044 0.043 0.015

Notes: Columns 1–7 report odds ratios from a logit model. Column 8 presents coefficients from a linear regression including a constant (coefficient not reported here). District-correlated robust standard errors in parentheses. Regressions are weighted using survey weights. Sample is married women aged 15–49 who usually reside in the household. Excluded religious category is “Hindu”; excluded education category is “No education.” Some observations are dropped in columns 3, 4, 6, and 7 because of a lack of variation in the value of the dependent variable within district. Observations for women who have never had any pregnancy are dropped in column 8 because the share of aborted pregnancies is not defined for these women.

Sources: Authors’ calculations using Demographic and Health Surveys of Nepal (1996–2011) and Technical Committee for Implementation of Comprehensive Abortion Care (2010).

p < .10; *p < .05; **p < .01