Table 1.
Error comparison between numerical simulation and mathematical models.
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fx | IS1(%) | 12.5 | 15.6 | 14.3 | 16.7 | 18.4 | 20.3 |
| DS2(%) | 5.69 | 2.30 | 2.46 | 2.54 | 2.37 | 5.47 | |
| Fy | IS(%) | 13.2 | 16.4 | 17.9 | 20.3 | 21.5 | 16.3 |
| DS(%) | 2.35 | 5.67 | 3.42 | 3.75 | 5.48 | 2.27 | |
| Fz | IS(%) | 24.3 | 21.1 | 15.7 | 18.2 | 17.2 | 14.7 |
| DS(%) | 4.55 | 4.52 | 4.39 | 4.41 | 4.58 | 4.62 | |
| Mx | IS(%) | 17.2 | 18.6 | 20.5 | 21.3 | 12.6 | 13.5 |
| DS(%) | 6.43 | 4.93 | 4.87 | 4.72 | 4.65 | 5.78 | |
| My | IS(%) | 16.8 | 18.0 | 16.9 | 20.5 | 21.3 | 15.7 |
| DS(%) | 6.18 | 7.32 | 6.20 | 6.44 | 6.47 | 6.14 | |
| Mz | IS(%) | 18.9 | 19.3 | 22.1 | 20.6 | 14.5 | 18.2 |
| DS(%) | 5.37 | 5.23 | 5.64 | 5.76 | 5.24 | 5.16 | |
IS1 (%) is the error between the theoretical and the simulation values in the ideal state; DS2 (%) is the error between the theoretical and the simulation values in the case of considering the deformation stiffness of flexure joints.