Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 12;16(8):1276. doi: 10.3390/s16081276

Table 3.

Comparison with other methods on different scenes of the XJTU-IAIR traffic scene dataset.

Traffic Scenes Methods Frames GT TP FP FN Precision (%) Recall (%) FPS
Highway Ours 999 1998 1998 0 0 100.0 100.0 30
He’s [14] 999 1998 1805 183 172 90.8 91.3 14
Bertozzi’s [41] 999 1998 1886 33 79 98.3 96.0 35
Seo’s [9] 999 1998 1711 211 78 89.0 95.6 21
Moderate Urban Ours 999 1998 1966 30 0 98.5 100.0 18
He’s [14] 999 1998 1946 419 31 82.3 98.4 11
Bertozzi’s [41] 999 1998 1649 236 152 87.5 91.6 34
Seo’s [9] 999 1998 1363 124 511 91.7 72.7 14
Heavy Urban Ours 899 1692 1621 89 26 94.8 98.4 19
He’s [14] 899 1692 1609 608 69 72.6 95.9 11
Bertozzi’s [41] 899 1692 1289 386 212 77.0 85.9 31
Seo’s [9] 899 1692 970 295 441 76.7 68.7 15
Illumination Ours 1040 2080 2080 0 0 100.0 100.0 23
He’s [14] 1040 2080 1725 697 305 71.2 85.0 23
Bertozzi’s [41] 1040 2080 1882 185 32 91.0 98.3 34
Seo’s [9] 1040 2080 1506 448 128 77.1 92.2 17
Night Ours 804 1566 1566 10 0 99.4 100.0 35
He’s [14] 804 1566 1491 326 75 82.1 95.2 12
Bertozzi’s [41] 804 1566 942 379 603 71.3 61.0 36
Seo’s [9] 804 1566 1383 104 87 93.0 94.1 24
Changing Lanes Ours 548 1096 1096 0 0 100.0 100.0 28
He’s [14] 548 1096 876 368 81 70.4 91.5 13
Bertozzi’s [41] 548 1096 1015 85 5 92.3 99.5 39
Seo’s [9] 548 1096 975 99 24 90.8 97.6 21