Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0161818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161818

Table 1. The effect of DNase digestion on the antigenic activity of the supernatant.

STS % Reduction
ELISA supernatant OD450 OD450 of OD450
Plasma format ng/ml Control DNased With DNase
SLE plasma 1 direct 2,000 0.769 0.781 0
SLE plasma 1 PLL captured 250 0.813 0.417 49
SLE plasma 2 direct 2,000 0.820 0.607 26
SLE plasma 2 PLL captured 250 1.007 0.277 73
SLE plasma 3 direct 2,000 0.485 0.409 16
SLE plasma 3 PLL captured 500 0.871 0.471 46
Anti-SSA direct 2,000 0.757 0.645 15
Anti-SSA PLL captured 500 1.112 1.070 4
Anti-SSB direct 1,500 0.979 0.843 14
Anti-SSB PLL captured 250 0.878 0.351 60
Anti-dsDNA direct 2,000 0.515 0.435 15
Anti-dsDNA PLL captured 1,000 1.055 0.424 60
Anti-histone direct 250 2.162 2.134 1
Anti-histone PLL captured 5 0.861 0.743 14
Anti-RNP direct 500 1.885 1.900 0
Anti-RNP PLL captured 25 1.100 0.534 51
Anti-Sm direct 250 1.704 1.730 0
Anti-Sm PLL captured 100 1.042 0.860 17

The effect of DNase treatment of the STS-supernatant was examined using both the direct coat and the PLL capture ELISA formats. STS-supernatant was DNased for 1h with 40 Kunitz units/ml DNase I. A range of concentrations of untreated STS-supernatant and identically diluted DNased supernatant was coated directly to plates, or captured in wells with PLL, and then examined by ELISA using 1/800 dilution of SLE or index plasmas. STS-supernatant concentration refers to the PicoGreen DNA content of the untreated control. Data shown are for the concentration tested for which the OD450 of the untreated STS-supernatant was closest to 1.0. Percent reduction upon DNasing was computed (see text). Cases where signal was higher for DNased supernatant than for untreated supernatant are reported as 0.