Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr 17;42(5):1421–1430. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24921

TABLE 3.

ER-Positive vs. ER-Negative

Meta-classifier PS = G-Q-m Avg. features per fold Avg. acc % Sens. % Spec. %
C1 256-32-17 4 84.44 80 89
C2 64-32-17 3 81.1 90 72
C3 64-32-17 3 76.11 80 72
C4 64-8-11 5 79.44 70 89
C5 64-8-13 5 84.44 80 89
C6 64-32-17 5 82.22 70 94

52.6% majority class, best results are in bold. Results are from initial enhancement kinetic map and rapid-delayed-washout habitat.