Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;17(5):640–647. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.6.29969

Table 2.

Features of patients with and without successful intubation.

Intubation groupa

Feature Unsuccessful (n=37) Successful (n=113) p-value
Patient characteristics
 Age, y 52 (15–94) 62 (18–92) 0.12
 Weight, kilograms (n=148) 79 (54–181) 79 (29–181) 0.03
 Sex 0.07
  Male 30 (81) 74 (65)
  Female 7 (19) 39 (35)
 Height, ft (n=34) (n=105) 0.05
  4 to 5 ½ 8 (24) 44 (42)
  5 ½ to 6 ½ 26 (76) 61 (58)
Features of EMS experience
 EMS crew 0.009
  Paramedic/EMT-basic 21 (57) 37 (33)
  Paramedic/paramedic 16 (43) 76 (67)
 Intubator experience, y (n=131) 5.0 (0.8–30.7) 7.1 (0.6–33.3) 0.22
 Intubator experience, y (n=35) (n=96) 0.61
  <1 1 (3) 6 (6)
  1 to 4 16 (46) 37 (39)
  5 to 9 8 (23) 17 (18)
  ≥10 10 (29) 36 (38)
 Intubation attempts 0.03
  1 22 (59) 90 (80)
  2 13 (35) 16 (14)
  3 2 (5) 4 (4)
  4 0 3 (3)
 Intubation attempts 0.01
  1 22 (59) 90 (80)
  >1 15 (41) 23 (20)
 Cervical collar 0.10
  No 25 (68) 91 (81)
  Yes 12 (32) 22 (19)
 Rapid sequence intubation (n=112) 0.72
  No 27 (73) 85 (76)
  Yes 10 (27) 27 (24)
 Endotracheal tube size, mm, internal diameter (n=36) 0.02
  6, 6.5, or 7 15 (42) 73 (65)
  7.5 or 8 21 (58) 40 (35)
 Glottis view (n=30) (n=109) <0.001
  Entire 8 (27) 87 (80)
  Some 4 (13) 15 (14)
  Little 5 (17) 7 (6)
  None 13 (43) 0
Stylet (n=34) 0.44
Gum bougie 27 (79) 76 (67)
Wire/satin slip 6 (18) 32 (28)
Other 1 (3) 5 (4)

EMS, emergency medical services; EMT, emergency medical technician

a

Values are median (range) or No. of patients (%)