Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2009 May 18;32(3):278–288. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.05.001

Table 4.

Results of the healthy eating recall (prompted) logistic regression (n = 1093).

Model 1—demographic Odds ratios (95% CI) p value Model 2—includes social cognitive variables p value
Age group
 18–54 years 1.00 1.00
 55+ 1.39 (.99–1.94) .06 1.36 (.97–1.91) .08
Gender
 Male 1.00 1.00
 Female .92 (.67–1.26) .62 .93 (.67–1.29) .65
Education
 Less than high school 1.00 1.00
 High school or technical .37 (.22–.65) .000 .39 (.22–.68) .001
 University complete .54 (.40–.77) .001 .54 (.38–.78) .001
Income
 Less than $20,000/year 1.00 1.00
 $20,000–39,999 .98 (.47–2.06) .96 1.04 (.49–2.21) .92
 $40,000–59,000 .84 (.52–1.37) .50 .89 (.54–1.46) .64
 $60,000–79,999 1.16 (.71–1.89) .56 1.10 (.67–1.80) .70
 $80,000–99,999 1.20 (.75–1.91) .45 1.19 (.74–1.91) .47
 Greater than $100,000 1.49 (.83–2.68) .19 1.55 (.85–2.80) .15
Fruit and vegetable consumption
 <5/day 1.00 1.00
 5–10/day .62 (.25–1.50) .29 .58 (.23–1.38) .21
 >10/day .56 (.23–1.38) .21 .51 (.21–1.26) .15
Self-rated health
 Excellent 1.00
 Very good .67 (.21–2.10) .49
 Good .70 (.23–2.10) .52
 Fair .64 (.21–1.92) .43
 Poor .40 (.13–1.27) .12
 Diet beliefsa 1.00 (.99–1.01) .65
 Intentionsa .98 (.92–1.05) .57
a

Continuous variables.