Table 5.
Model 4 |
Model 5 |
Model 6 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed effect | Estimate | SE | p | Estimate | SE | p | Estimate | SE | p |
Morning cortisol, π0 | |||||||||
Average morning cortisol, β00, γ000 | 0.6934 | 0.0121 | < .001 | 0.6943 | 0.0121 | < .001 | 0.6987 | 0.0129 | < .001 |
Childhood adversity, γ001 | –0.0109 | 0.0045 | .017 | –0.0094 | 0.0045 | .038 | –0.0079 | 0.0045 | .079 |
Youth self-esteem, γ002 | — | — | — | 0.0423 | 0.0160 | .008 | 0.0405 | 0.0160 | .012 |
Caregiver self-esteem, γ003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0309 | 0.0165 | .061 |
Female, γ004 | –0.0042 | 0.0130 | .746 | –0.0058 | 0.0130 | .657 | –0.0057 | 0.0130 | .662 |
Age, γ005 | 0.0066 | 0.0037 | .077 | 0.0061 | 0.0037 | .100 | 0.0052 | 0.0037 | .164 |
Caregiver education, γ006 | 0.0029 | 0.0132 | .825 | 0.0027 | 0.0131 | .840 | 0.0080 | 0.0135 | .557 |
Health status, γ007 | –0.0030 | 0.0087 | .727 | –0.0017 | 0.0086 | .841 | –0.0034 | 0.0088 | .701 |
Neuroticism: “anxious, easily upset,” γ008 | 0.0019 | 0.0069 | .782 | 0.0016 | 0.0070 | .818 | 0.0024 | 0.0070 | .738 |
Neuroticism: “calm, emotionally stable” (R), γ009 | –0.0032 | 0.0073 | .659 | 0.0021 | 0.0075 | .777 | 0.0025 | 0.0075 | .736 |
Depression, γ0010 | –0.0020 | 0.0016 | .215 | –0.0004 | 0.0017 | .801 | –0.0004 | 0.0017 | .833 |
Caregiver sex: female, γ0011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | –0.0138 | 0.0132 | .296 |
Caregiver age, γ0012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | –0.0001 | 0.0007 | .824 |
Weekend, β01, γ010 | –0.1018 | 0.0103 | < .001 | –0.1021 | 0.0103 | < .001 | –0.1019 | 0.0103 | < .001 |
Wake-up time, β02, γ020 | –0.0132 | 0.0066 | .045 | –0.0126 | 0.0066 | .057 | –0.0129 | 0.0066 | .052 |
Daily negative affect, β03, γ030 | –0.0197 | 0.0148 | .181 | –0.0201 | 0.0147 | .170 | –0.0205 | 0.0147 | .163 |
Daily positive affect, β04, γ040 | –0.0075 | 0.0142 | .600 | –0.0073 | 0.0141 | .606 | –0.0102 | 0.0141 | .469 |
Cortisol awakening response (CAR), π1 | |||||||||
Average CAR, β10, γ100 | 0.0069 | 0.0118 | .558 | 0.0065 | 0.0118 | .582 | 0.0028 | 0.0135 | .834 |
Childhood adversity, γ101 | 0.0065 | 0.0048 | .182 | 0.0056 | 0.0049 | .247 | 0.0048 | 0.0049 | .326 |
Youth self-esteem, γ102 | — | — | — | –0.0235 | 0.0176 | .182 | –0.0227 | 0.0179 | .204 |
Caregiver self-esteem, γ103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | –0.0237 | 0.0165 | .150 |
Female, γ104 | –0.0315 | 0.0129 | .015 | –0.0307 | 0.0129 | .017 | –0.0307 | 0.0129 | .018 |
Age, γ105 | 0.0060 | 0.0037 | .104 | 0.0063 | 0.0037 | .090 | 0.0069 | 0.0037 | .065 |
Caregiver education, γ106 | 0.0222 | 0.0132 | .094 | 0.0222 | 0.0132 | .094 | 0.0196 | 0.0138 | .156 |
Health status, γ107 | 0.0071 | 0.0095 | .453 | 0.0063 | 0.0095 | .505 | 0.0071 | 0.0096 | .460 |
Neuroticism: “anxious, easily upset,” γ108 | 0.0042 | 0.0077 | .590 | 0.0044 | 0.0078 | .570 | 0.0040 | 0.0077 | .610 |
Neuroticism: “calm, emotionally stable” (R), γ109 | –0.0008 | 0.0077 | .913 | –0.0038 | 0.0081 | .638 | –0.0040 | 0.0082 | .628 |
Depression, γ1010 | –0.0005 | 0.0016 | .738 | –0.0014 | 0.0017 | .400 | –0.0016 | 0.0017 | .359 |
Caregiver sex: female, γ1011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0097 | 0.0143 | .499 |
Caregiver age, γ1011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | –0.0004 | 0.0006 | .523 |
Weekend, β11, γ110 | –0.0294 | 0.0132 | .026 | –0.0291 | 0.0132 | .027 | –0.0293 | 0.0132 | .027 |
Wake-up time, β12, γ120 | –0.0192 | 0.0075 | .010 | –0.0196 | 0.0075 | .009 | –0.0194 | 0.0075 | .010 |
Daily negative affect, β13, γ130 | 0.0003 | 0.0175 | .985 | 0.0004 | 0.0175 | .981 | 0.0012 | 0.0175 | .947 |
Daily positive affect, β14, γ140 | –0.0103 | 0.0127 | .418 | –0.0105 | 0.0126 | .404 | –0.0079 | 0.0129 | .541 |
Time since waking, π2 | |||||||||
Average linear slope, β20, γ200 | –0.0385 | 0.0022 | < .001 | –0.0386 | 0.0022 | < .001 | –0.0391 | 0.0023 | < .001 |
Childhood adversity, γ201 | 0.0001 | 0.0004 | .730 | 0.0000 | 0.0004 | .934 | –0.0001 | 0.0004 | .841 |
Child self-esteem, γ202 | — | — | — | –0.0030 | 0.0015 | .044 | –0.0028 | 0.0015 | .055 |
Caregiver self-esteem, γ203 | — | — | — | — | — | — | –0.0029 | 0.0014 | .048 |
Female, γ204 | –0.0012 | 0.0011 | .306 | –0.0011 | 0.0011 | .350 | –0.0010 | 0.0011 | .356 |
Age, γ205 | –0.0006 | 0.0003 | .087 | –0.0005 | 0.0003 | .110 | –0.0005 | 0.0003 | .177 |
Caregiver education, γ206 | 0.0000 | 0.0011 | .981 | 0.0000 | 0.0011 | .992 | –0.0004 | 0.0012 | .723 |
Health status, γ207 | –0.0002 | 0.0007 | .761 | –0.0003 | 0.0007 | .668 | –0.0002 | 0.0007 | .809 |
Neuroticism: “anxious, easily upset,” γ208 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | .333 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | .316 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | .369 |
Neuroticism: “calm, emotionally stable” (R), γ209 | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | .855 | –0.0003 | 0.0007 | .703 | –0.0003 | 0.0007 | .667 |
Depression, γ2010 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | .413 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | .966 | 0.0000 | 0.0002 | .981 |
Caregiver sex: female, γ2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0012 | 0.0012 | .298 |
Caregiver age, γ2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | .887 |
Weekend, β21, γ210 | 0.0076 | 0.0010 | < .001 | 0.0076 | 0.0010 | < .001 | 0.0076 | 0.0010 | < .001 |
Wake-up time, β22, γ220 | –0.0007 | 0.0006 | .216 | –0.0008 | 0.0006 | .194 | –0.0008 | 0.0006 | .206 |
Daily negative affect, β23, γ230 | 0.0024 | 0.0013 | .062 | 0.0024 | 0.0013 | .058 | 0.0025 | 0.0013 | .053 |
Daily positive affect, β24, γ240 | –0.0002 | 0.0012 | .883 | –0.0002 | 0.0012 | .874 | 0.0001 | 0.0012 | .957 |
Time since waking2, π3 | |||||||||
Average curvature, β30, γ300 | 0.0008 | 0.0001 | < .001 | 0.0008 | 0.0001 | < .001 | 0.0008 | 0.0001 | < .001 |
Smoking, π4 | |||||||||
Intercept, β40, γ400 | 0.1462 | 0.0473 | .002 | 0.1461 | 0.0474 | .002 | 0.1460 | 0.0477 | .002 |
Exercise, π5 | |||||||||
Intercept, β50, γ500 | 0.0187 | 0.0082 | .023 | 0.0191 | 0.0082 | .020 | 0.0190 | 0.0082 | .021 |
Note: Intercepts indicate average cortisol values at awakening; average slopes of time since waking indicate change in cortisol per 1-hr change in time; average slopes of time since waking2 indicate change in cortisol per 1-hr change in time2. R= reverse-scored. Thirty-three cortisol values were more than 3 SD above the mean; when analyses were run after Winsorizing these values, the magnitude of the main results remained approximately the same as reported here, despite minor changes in the p values (highest p value = .057).