A. Schematic demonstrating in vivo two-photon calcium imaging of
LA axons in POR (LA→POR).
B. Example two-photon image in POR, with a subset of LA→POR
axons outlined in red.
C. ΔF/F traces from those LA→POR axons outlined in B.
A 100% change in fluorescence (ΔF/F) is denoted via each black
vertical line.
D. Heatmap of single trial cue-evoked response timecourses (ΔF/F) from an
example FC-responsive LA→POR axon, sorted by visual cue and
by latency to first lick (blue ticks). Dark blue bar denotes duration of cue
presentation.
E. Normalized auROC timecourses for all significantly driven
LA→POR axons. Each neuron’s responses to all
three cues are shown. Neurons are sorted by their preferred cue. Note the high
proportion of FC-preferring neurons.
F. We observed a significant visual cue-evoked response in 13% of all
recorded LA→POR axons (pie charts). Most axons preferred the
FC vs. the NC or QC. Errorbars: 95% confidence
intervals.
G. By normalizing cellular tuning curves to the largest response and averaging
across all responsive LA→POR axons, we observed a strong bias
towards the food cue. Errorbars: SEM across cells.
H. Stable mean FC-evoked timecourses (right) for one example
axon, recorded across 6 imaging sessions (left).
I. During each imaging session for each well-trained mouse, we calculated a FC
bias index (dashed line at 0.33: no bias towards the food cue) across the
field-of-view (FOV). We observed a reliable population bias towards the FC in
LA→POR axons across sessions. Errorbars: SEM across
animals.
J. Emergence of FC bias from V1 to POR to LA→POR. Errorbars:
SEM across cells. * p<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis; FC: food cue; QC:
quinine cue; NC: neutral cue. Tests on proportions: Tukey’s HSD. See
also Figure S6.