Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 17;41(10):1918–1930. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0802-z

Table 3.

Multirater Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient values between the observer pairs

MRI features 1 vs. 2 2 vs. 3 1 vs. 3
Wall thickness 0.70 (0.54–0.81) 0.58 (0.38–0.73) 0.69 (0.53–0.81)
Mesorectal lymph nodes 0.83 (0.72–0.89) 0.78 (0.66–0.87) 0.83 (0.72–0.89)
Obturator lymph nodes 0.31 (0.06–0.53) 0.26 (0.00–0.48) 0.27 (0.01–0.49)
Iliac lymph nodes 0.38 (0.14–0.58) 0.23 (−0.03–0.46) 0.24 (−0.01–0.47)
Inguinal lymph nodes 0.65 (0.48–0.78) 0.38 (0.14–0.58) 0.43 (0.20–0.62)
% of circumference involved 0.16 (0.03–0.29) 0.17 (0.06–0.27) 0.47 (0.27–0.67)
Mural T2 signal 26% (15/58)a 43% (25/58)a 41% (24/58)a
Perimural T2 signal 0.50 (0.34–0.67) 0.57 (0.41–0.73) 0.71 (0.58–0.85)
T1 enhancement 0.13 (0.03–0.24) 0.14 (0.01–0.27) 0.39 (0.22–0.56)
T1 enhancement pattern 0.13 (0.02–0.25) 0.25 (0.12–0.38) 0.43 (0.25–0.61)
Perimural enhancement 0.46 (0.29–0.64) 0.34 (0.17–0.50) 0.59 (0.42–0.76)
Mural fat 0.67 (0.44–0.90) 0.57 (0.34–0.81) 0.64 (0.37–0.90)
Ulcers 64% (37/58)a 0.13 (0–0.39) 0.25 (0–0.57)
Supralevatoric fistula 0.48 (0.24–0.72) 0.57 (0.31–0.82) 0.59 (0.39–0.79)
Supralevatoric abscess 0.53 (0.21–0.86) 0.53 (0.24–0.82) 1
Creeping fat 0.48 (0.18–0.77) 0.69 (0.46–0.92) 0.76 (0.53–0.98)
Comb sign 0.18 (0.01–0.34) 0.20 (0.03–0.36) 0.55 (0.32–0.78)

aProportion of agreement calculated instead of kappa, because observed concordance is smaller than mean-chance concordance