. 2016 Jun 22;244(4):939–960. doi: 10.1007/s00425-016-2559-6

Table 2.

The calculated significance values (P) for protein spots differentially expressed when compared individually within the studied classes by the multivariate analysis (at P < 0.05)

Protein spot number and P value for classes compared
C(8) and Tu + (8)	C(8) and D + (8)	C(8) and Tu + D(8)	C(8) and C(9)	C(9) and Tu − (9)	Tu + (8) and Tu − (9)
2/0.0396	1/0.0013	3/0.0036	1/0.0069	1/0.0069	1/0.0142
10/0.0080	3/0.0314	4/0.0455	2/0.0004	2/0.0084	3/0.0361
11/0.0289	4/0.0001	5/0.0111	5/0.0286	5/0.0004	5/0.0400
12/0.0357	5/0.0015	6/0.0114	10/0.0041	6/0.0286	6/0.0202
	8/0.0077	8/0.0058		13/0.0041	8/0.0034
	11/0.0003	13/0.0081
	12/0.0440	14/0.0122
	13/0.0000	15/0.0337
	14/0.0001	16/0.0125
	17/0.0000	23/0.0020
	18/0.0000	24/0.0143
	20/0.0021	26/0.0226
	21/0.0199
4⁺	13⁺	12⁺	4⁺	5⁺	5⁺
12⁺⁺	22⁺⁺	26⁺⁺	12⁺⁺	14⁺⁺	8⁺⁺

+ Indicates the total number of protein spots significantly different when compared individually

++ Indicates the total number of significant spots for the studied class pairs as a result of multivariate approach (for details see Figs. 4a–c, 5a–c)