Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;10(5):883–897. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0535-6

Table 3.

Effects of following the behavior-related modules on physical activity and dietary behavior 6 months after getting KNW-access

B SE [95 % CI] d [95 % CI] f 2 p p fdr
Physical activity, UC= ref.
Numbers of days PA
 Module PA used .362 .25 [−.14; .86] −.32 [−.64; .00] .012 .154 .246
 Module PA not used −.121 .18 [−.47; .22] .22 [.00; .43] .002 .492 .656
Light PA
 Module PA used −119.605 128.82 [−372.08; 132.87] .13 [−.19; .45] .006 .353 .403
 Module PA not used 127.717 88.90 [−301.95;46.52] .16 [−.05;.38] .005 .151 .402
Moderate PA
 Module PA used 197.609 86.09 [28.88; 366.33] −. 32 [−.64; −00] .013 .022* .120
 Module PA not used 91.956 61.96 [−29.07; 212.98] .02 [−.19; 24] .006 .136 .402
Vigorous PA
 Module PA used 34.531 61.34 [−85.70; 154.76] −.19 [−.52; .13] −.000 .573 .573
 Module PA not used −47.259 42.39 [−130.34; 35.82] .05 [−.16; .27] .004 .265 .530
Dietary behavior, UC= ref.
Vegetable consumption
 Module Diet used 7.86 4.81 [−1.55; 17.30] −.09 [−.31; .14] −.004 .102 .204
 Module Diet not used 11.123 5.62 [.11; 22.14] −.23 [−.50; .04] −.018 .048* .384
Fruit consumption 7.876
 Module Diet used .181 .08 [.02; .35] −.12 [−.35; .10] .016 .031* .120
 Module Diet not used −.075 .10 [−.27; .12] .05 [−.22; .32] .006 .444 .656
Fish consumption
 Module Diet used .542 .27 [.01; 1.07] −.11 [−.34; .11] −.002 .045* .120
 Module Diet not used −.021 .31 [−.63; .59] .03 [−.24; .30] .000 .946 .965
Bread consumption
 Module Diet used .177 .14 [−.09; .44] −.02 [−.25; .21] −.000 .191 .254
 Module Diet not used .001 .16 [−.30; .31] .03 [−.23 −.31] .002 .965 .965

Effect of module use was tested using 3 categories: 0 = UC, 1 = IC, specific module not used; 2 = IC, specific module used. Results of the fully adjusted models displayed. Dietary outcomes: N = 403, PA outcomes N = 394

IC intervention condition, UC usual care control condition, ref reference group, PA physical activity; p fdr = controlling for false discovery rate; d=Cohen’s d (corrected for baseline value), f 2= Cohen’s f 2 : f 2 ≥0.02, f 2 ≥0.15, and f 2 .≥0.35 represent small, medium, and large effect sizes

*significant result (p < 0.05)