Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2016 Jun 25;33:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.06.004

Table 1.

Chemical strategies and principles applied to the discovery of antagonists for cavity insertion methyllysine binders and surface groove methyllysine binders.

Cavity Insertion Binders Surface Groove Binders
Hit Discovery & Screening Strategies Screen focused small molecule or fragment libraries
Employ target class cross screening
Utilize structure-based design for hit optimization
Apply structure-based design
Screen peptide or peptoid libraries
Design Principles Exploit cation-π and H-bonding interactions in aromatic cage
Utilize conformational constrained alkyl amines
Use available Kme peptide SAR
Target binding sites adjacent to aromatic cage
Introduce unnatural amino acids, Kme mimics, and non-peptidic features
Major Challenge Fragment-like size may result in low affinity Low cell permeability may decrease overall utility
Example L3MBTL1 + H4K20me2 (pdb 2PQW)
graphic file with name nihms797059t1.jpg
CBX7 + H3K27me3 (pdb 4X3K)
graphic file with name nihms797059t2.jpg