Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Aug 11;37(27):2436–2446. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24467

Table 1.

Effects of nonpolar solvent modeling (inp) upon the performance of MMPBSA to predict relative binding affinities. All calculations were conducted with the default SES surface (sasopt=0), the default solvent probe (dprob=1.4), the default atomic radius option (radiopt=0), and the default grid spacing of 0.50 Angstrom (space=0.50). The RMSD’s of ΔΔG are in kcal/mol.

Systems INP=1 INP=2
RMSD R Slope RMSD R Slope
CDK+PKA 5.81 0.81 0.18 3.42 0.71 0.29
glucosidase 4.43 0.57 0.16 1.94 0.30 0.23
thrombin 11.02 0.87 0.23 4.26 0.86 0.42
trypsin 9.89 0.74 0.18 3.30 0.53 0.32
urokinase 7.19 0.73 0.22 2.61 0.53 0.33
Factor Xa 5.99 0.75 0.23 3.26 0.67 0.27